HIKMA PUBLISHER

Hikma Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies
Published: August 25, 2026 | Vol. 1 Issue 3 | E-ISSN: 3139-5597
Research Article

From Trade Unions to Digital Platforms: Reconfiguring Organizational Conflict Resolution in the Era of Digital Transformation, with Implications for Cameroon and Nigeria

Ngum Epiphania Keming1βœ‰, Jennifer Onyinye Adingwupu1
1 Igbinedion University
πŸ“„ Download PDFπŸ”— DOI Lookup

Abstract

Conflict is an inevitable feature of organisational life, and trade unions, reconciliation, mediation, and arbitration have long served as the primary means of resolving it in sub-Saharan African economies such as Cameroon and Nigeria. Objective: this seminar article investigates how digital transformation reshapes both the sources of organisational conflict and the mechanisms available for its resolution, extending the established analysis of collective mechanisms into the digital era and drawing out implications for business institutions in Cameroon and Nigeria. Methods: the study adopts a qualitative, systematic narrative literature-review design. An examination of 25 peer-reviewed articles, books, and policies published between 1968 and 2023 from the management, information systems and industrial relations fields reveals, through directed content analysis based on ten-codes covering five digitally caused sources of conflicts and five digital facilitators of resolution, that: digital conflict sources make up 40 percent of the coded corpus as opposed to 8 percent for digital resolution enablers; surveillance and algorithmic management emerge as the most common sub-theme (five out of twenty-five sources), whereas e-learning enabled training and issues of data ownership remain untouched. An institutional comparative assessment shows that Nigeria, with its codified Trade Disputes Act, provides a somewhat stronger ground for accommodating digital tools of dispute resolution than Cameroon, whose legal system is weak and fragile. Technology and conflict: dependent on leadership, digital competence and ethics.
Keywords: Conflict Resolution; Trade Unions; Digital Transformation; Online Dispute Resolution; Algorithmic Management; Sub-Saharan Africa.

References

  1. Bamber, G. J., Lansbury, R. D., & Wailes, N. (2020). International and comparative employment relations: Globalisation and change (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  2. Caputo, A., Kargina, M., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2023). Conflict in virtual teams: A bibliometric analysis, systematic review, and research agenda. International Journal of Conflict Management, 34(1), 1–31.
  3. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
  4. Dinyuy, F. C., & Şener, U. C. (2021). The impact of trade unions on employee performance in Cameroon: Teachers' and drivers' unions cases. Florya Chronicles of Political Economy, 7(2), 105–126.
  5. Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132.
  6. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
  7. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (3rd ed.). Penguin Books.
  8. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53–62.
  9. Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14(6), 615–632.
  10. Katsh, E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017). Digital justice: Technology and the internet of disputes. Oxford University Press.
  11. Kaufman, B. E. (2020). The role of trade unions in modern industrial relations: A reappraisal. Industrial Relations Review, 73(3), 589–618.
  12. Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410.
  13. Lythreatis, S., El-Kassar, A.-N., & Singh, S. K. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359.
  14. MΓΆhlmann, M., & Zalmanson, L. (2017). Hands on the wheel: Navigating algorithmic management and Uber drivers' autonomy. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017). Seoul, South Korea.
  15. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
  16. Rahim, M. A. (2011). Managing conflict in organizations (4th ed.). Transaction Publishers.
  17. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
  18. Rule, C. (2020). Online dispute resolution and the future of justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 277–292.
  19. Sabo, A., Maishanu, M. M., & Muhammad, S. (2018). Industrial relations environment in Nigeria: Reviewing conflict causes and taxonomies among public sector employees. European Journal of Human Resource Management Studies, 2(1), 74–86.
  20. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328.
  21. Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265–274.
  22. Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems. Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.
  23. Tursunbayeva, A., Di Lauro, S., & Pagliari, C. (2021). The ethics of people analytics: Risks, opportunities and recommendations. Personnel Review, 51(3), 900–921.
  24. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
  25. Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75.
πŸ”“ Open Access | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Related Posts

Scroll to Top