HIKMA PUBLISHER

Hikma Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies
Published: September 26, 2026 | Vol. 1 Issue 3 | E-ISSN: 3139-5597
Research Article

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ACADEMIC STRESS REDUCTION AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS: EVIDENCE FROM PRINCE ABUBAKAR AUDU UNIVERSITY, ANYIGBA, KOGI STATE, NIGERIA

Timothy Abayomi Atoyebi, Ph.D.1✉, Edime Yunusa, Ph.D1, Francis, Vincent Eshialu2, Ejuchegahi A. Angwaomaodoko1
1 Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Anyigba, Nigeria
2 Department of Education, College of Education, Kean University, Union, NJ, USA
📄 Download PDF🔗 DOI Lookup

Abstract

This study examined the influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on academic stress reduction as perceived by undergraduate students of Prince Abubakar Audu University, Anyigba, Kogi State, Nigeria. The study was anchored on the Technology Acceptance Model and Cognitive Load Theory. A mixed-methods, descriptive survey design was adopted, and a multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 380 undergraduates from the Faculties of Management Sciences, Social Sciences and Natural Sciences, with the sample size determined using Krejcie and Morgan's formula. Primary data were obtained through structured questionnaires and in-depth interviews, while secondary data were drawn from journals, textbooks and other relevant publications. Quantitative data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, mean scores, chi-square and independent samples t-test, while qualitative data from the interviews were analysed thematically. Findings revealed a high prevalence of AI usage among undergraduates, with ChatGPT the most widely used tool, followed by Meta AI, Google Gemini, Grammarly, Microsoft Copilot, QuillBot and Photomath. Students reported using these tools mainly to generate ideas, summarise lecture notes, improve writing, solve academic problems and prepare for examinations. Hypothesis testing revealed a statistically significant relationship between the prevalence of AI usage and academic stress reduction (χ² = 43.805, df = 1, p < .001) and between patterns of AI usage and academic stress reduction (χ² = 96.755, df = 1, p < .001), while no significant difference was found in the reduction of academic stress between male and female undergraduates (t(378) = -0.542, p = .588). The study concluded that artificial intelligence has become an important academic resource that contributes meaningfully to reducing academic stress among undergraduates when used responsibly. It recommended that university management should organise regular AI training programmes, strengthen digital infrastructure and develop clear policies guiding the ethical and effective use of artificial intelligence among students.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Academic Stress; Undergraduate Students; Technology Acceptance; Cognitive Load; Nigeria

References

  1. Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100068.
  2. Cambra-Fierro, J. J., Blasco, M. F., López-Pérez, M. E., & Trifu, A. (2024). ChatGPT adoption and its influence on faculty well-being: Empirical research in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12871-0
  3. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43.
  4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  5. Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 12451.
  6. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers.
  7. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
  8. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
  9. Makhambetova, A., Zhiyenbayeva, N., & Ergesheva, E. (2021). Personalized learning strategy as a tool to improve academic performance and motivation of students. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 16(1), 1–17.
  10. Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College students' academic stress and its relation to anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16(1), 41–51.
  11. Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stress on students in higher education. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 104–112.
  12. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
  13. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296.
  14. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28–36.
  15. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
  16. Wilks, S. E. (2008). Resilience amid academic stress: The moderating impact of social support among social work students. Advances in Social Work, 9(2), 106–125.
🔓 Open Access | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Related Posts

Scroll to Top